She approaches finances holistically rather than a "one product fits all" sale. I've worked with several advisors before, this experience was genuinely different.
MicroTax for the
people who built it
and want to keep what they built
Founders and owner-operators of profitable privately-held businesses at $1M–$10M+ in revenue. Professional services firms, agencies, e-commerce, technology, manufacturing. Where the entity structure determines the tax bill, and the entity structure is usually wrong.
A profitable sole-prop or single-member LLC pays self-employment tax on every dollar of net profit. The S-Corp election typically saves $15,000–$25,000 annually for owners taking $250K+ in distributions. Most owners who would benefit, haven't filed.
The financial life of a successful owner-operator scales faster than the financial advice supporting it. Entity, retirement plan stack, owner-comp design, §199A optimization, and succession architecture all need to evolve as the business grows, and almost never do, because no one on the team has the mandate. MicroTax is the team that does.
Who this serves
Founders and owner-operators of profitable privately-held businesses, professional services firms, agencies, e-commerce operators, technology companies, manufacturers, typically generating $1M–$10M in annual revenue with the owner taking $300K+ in compensation. The business is past founding-stage scrappiness and into operational maturity, with the owner increasingly thinking about the next decade rather than the next quarter.
The defining feature is that the business succeeded faster than the structural advice supporting it caught up. The entity that was right at $200K of revenue is rarely the right entity at $5M. The retirement plan stack that made sense at thirty doesn't optimize at fifty. The succession plan that should have started five years before exit usually starts six months before exit, when most of the available structuring has already lost its time value.
This is the audience where proactive design pays the largest absolute dollars, and where reactive compliance has the highest opportunity cost. The good news: every move is well-established and IRS-compliant. The work is in identifying which moves apply, sequencing them correctly, and executing on time.

What's typically going wrong
Each is well-documented and routinely missed, because the business has scaled past the original entity, the original plan, and the original advisor without an integrated review.

What changes under a MicroTax engagement
Seven specific moves, sequenced through the F.A.S.T. Steps method, entity work first, retirement architecture next, succession last.
Indicative year-one outcomes
Illustrative, strategy applicability depends on entity, activity, owner age and profile; individual results vary. DB plan capacity depends on actuarial assumptions and consistent profitability. §199A eligibility depends on income and activity classification.
From an owner who did the math
Related strategies for owner-operators
Fractional CFO for business owners
Strategic finance, cash-flow forecasting, KPI design, and board-ready reporting, without a full-time CFO hire. Integrated with the tax and retirement architecture rather than a parallel function. How it works →
§7702 Tax-Free Retirement, properly explained
Once the qualified-plan stack is full, the §7702 vehicle adds tax-free retirement income outside the contribution ceiling. Particularly valuable for business owners whose deferral capacity is high and whose post-exit income needs are predictable. Read the explainer →
S-Corp election done correctly
The decision matrix, the reasonable-compensation safe harbor, the interaction with §199A, and the mistakes that get reasonable owners audited. The S-Corp election is rarely complicated; it's rarely done right either. Read the article →